Commons:Deletion requests/File:HK Ritz-carltonhotel 20080321.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HK_Ritz-carltonhotel_20080321.jpg

Derivative work of presumably copyrighted advertising image. Powers (talk) 00:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image cannot be kept here. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since the hotel have been demolished in April, 2008 so the photo couldn't able to taken again. Beside, take advertising image in Hong Kong is not against copyrighted advertising image. See Category:Buses with advertisement Category:Buses_with_advertisement and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HK_Worldwide_House_Central_Tram_Stop_Beverly_Hills.JPG--WiNG (talk) 10:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:FOP#Hong Kong. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:FOP#Hong Kong because the advertisement is not "permanently situated". Teofilo (talk) 12:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, the building was demolished, but buildings are free, and the building was decorated "permanently". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When they put up the image, they did so because they knew it would be deliberately demolished soon after. I don't think this qualifies as permanently, thus

Delete. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 13:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The advertising image is neither a building, a sculpture, a model for a building nor a work of artistic craftsmanship. Those are the only works that attract FOP in HK. (2D photos/posters are not covered) MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]