Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Ma Temple 200907.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Ma Temple 200907.jpg

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Before use, need contact with author and get his permission. Althougt the file has licensed under cc-by by author. Ianbu (talk) 04:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and Keep Do you have any source and reference to proof that the photos is not allow ? I am the author of this picture, this photo is taken by me--WiNG (talk) 02:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Permission is depend on you. You can say no. Ianbu (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is common and reasonable for the author to setup the "need contact with author and get his permission", since many media have to use the photos without the author's permission for the commerical use, such as book publishing, TV commerical and advertiseing etc... and it made the crisis in Hong Kong too. So these media are against the cc-by license. See [1] and [2] It is a good way to solve the media use the photos without permission, although some media still ignore the author's request. You can also see this list too[3] --WiNG (talk) 08:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"need contact with author and get his permission" is not reasonable. CC-by just need attribution. It is not CC-by-permission. Ianbu (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you have this idea, Wikipedia don't have any licensing against "CC-by-permission". It depands on the author needs, I think that you are not respect the author. --WiNG (talk) 12:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You set another restriction than CC-by says. You want more respect.Ianbu (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This image, and 993 others, has the license template User:WiNG/Licensing. The template reads, in Google translation:

"Works produced by the WiNG above, using the Creative Commons "CC-BY 3.0 version" license protection. Any person to use and reproduced this picture, provided that you comply with "permission" to all the terms. Please respect the authors for their labor, thank you for your understanding! You have to clear in the placement of the next show I, the "user-Wing1990hk Wikipedia or Wikipedia user-Wing1990hk" for the picture the original author. Thank you for your cooperation! If want to reprint the pictures, please e-mail to wing1990hk-at-yahoo.com.hk contact me, to authorize the use of pictures. If you have a wiki account, you can in my conversation with my contact page and leave a message with your request."

This requires prior consent "contact me, to authorize the use of pictures" for use of the images. Wing admits that this is correct in his comments above.

Prior consent cannot be required under CC-BY and cannot be required for any image on Commons, so all 994 of the images that have this template must be deleted unless Wing changes the template. I have not closed this DR and deleted this one image only because I want Wing to understand and think about the fact that all 994 images will be deleted unless he or she changes the template. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

template had been changed....I am so disappointed about the policy of the wikipedia and the commons. These changes are not respect myself that pays many effort to take the photos. However, these photos are commonly illegally use for the mass media, books, even the property sales agent use my photos to earn many money. If your photos use in this way, do you feel angry? --WiNG (talk) 07:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

I think it would be good if you provided an English translation of your new license. The Google translation reads:

"Works produced by the Wing above, using the Creative Commons "CC-BY 3.0 version" license protection.

Any person to use and reproduced this picture, provided that you comply with "permission" to all the terms. Please respect the authors for their labor, thank you for your understanding! You have to clear in the placement of the next show I, the "user-Wing1990hk Wikipedia or Wikipedia user-Wing1990hk" for the picture the original author. Thank you for your cooperation!"

I am not certain what the sentence I have highlighted really means.

I hope you understand that any CC license allows others to sell your photographs and make money from them. If you did not want others to profit from your photographs, you should not have licensed them. And yes I understand that from experience -- in fact, as I say at User:Jameslwoodward, some of my Commons images have been used by a real estate agent for a calendar. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 08:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as I do not see the "email required" on the template now. --Waihorace (talk) 00:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Jameslwoodward see this term: [4]Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. So email required is also allowed in this license. --WiNG (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it means that the limitation can be less restrictive if you give them permission, not the other way round (i.e. you can't make it more restrictive even if you wish to. So you can ask people to inform you as a courtesy, but you can't force them to do so ). Also as mentioned by Jim, if you want to release it under a free license, you must allow commercial use. If you agree then Commons can Keep all the files since you have removed the email requirement. But if you do not wish to see your images used commercially, you will need to remove them from Commons. --Ben.MQ (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The translation of current template:

The above work is created by WiNG and protected by CC-BY 3.0.

To use or share my image, you must follow all requirements in the 'Permission' field. Please respect the fruit of labour of the author. Thank you for your understanding! You must indicate my name, 維基百科用戶-Wing1990hk or Wikipedia user -Wing1990hk, beside the image as the author. Thank you for your cooperation.

I see two more problems - the template says CC-BY 3.0 but you licensed your work under CC-BY-SA in Licensing section. Also I believe you cannot require where people place your name. (Am I correct? I can't find the FAQ that says this) Ben.MQ (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Problem solved Ben.MQ (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]